Ecuadorian vs Chippewa Unemployment
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Chippewa
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Ecuadorians
Chippewa
6.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Chippewa Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,664,443 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,819,653 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.35%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 10.1% | 50.0% |
| Range | 9.8% | 48.1% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 11.4% |
| Median | 6.2% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Chippewa by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nepalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Caribbean (6.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Senegalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Senegal (6.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and Haitian (6.2%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Senegalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Nepalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Haitian (6.2%, a difference of 0.62%), Central American Indian (6.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (6.2%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.3% |