Ecuadorian vs Guyanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Guyanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Guyanese
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Guyanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,777,611 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Guyanese |
Minimum | 0.14% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 27.5% |
Range | 28.5% | 24.0% |
Mean | 14.8% | 14.0% |
Median | 14.1% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Guyanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |