Ecuadorian vs Potawatomi Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Potawatomi
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Potawatomi
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Potawatomi Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.16%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 0.14% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 28.7% | 63.6% |
| Range | 28.5% | 60.6% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 20.2% |
| Median | 14.1% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 24.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Potawatomi by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |