Crow vs Lumbee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Crow
 Lumbee
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Crow
Lumbee
32.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Lumbee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,998,568 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 32.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,816,335 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 33.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Lumbee | 
| Minimum | 15.4% | 6.8% | 
| Maximum | 61.5% | 80.6% | 
| Range | 46.1% | 73.8% | 
| Mean | 39.3% | 39.4% | 
| Median | 40.9% | 39.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.3% | 30.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.1% | 48.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.8% | 18.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 16.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 15.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Crow and Lumbee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.7%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 4.3%), Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Houma (33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 3.6%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 5.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 27.7%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 27.8%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 28.0%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 28.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 28.3%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 28.4%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 28.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 28.9%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 29.1%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 29.4%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 30.3%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 30.4%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 30.6%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 31.3%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 31.7%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 32.4%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 33.0%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 33.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 34.1%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 34.2%  |