Crow vs Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Crow
Lumbee
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Crow
Lumbee
75.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,195,148 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 75.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,461 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Lumbee |
Minimum | 32.4% | 42.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.6% | 57.9% |
Mean | 69.1% | 80.3% |
Median | 76.8% | 79.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.7% | 70.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.1% | 97.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.4% | 27.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Lumbee by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and Ute (78.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |