Colville vs Maltese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Colville
Maltese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Colville
Maltese
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Maltese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,633,773 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,965,353 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 54.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Maltese |
Minimum | 0.42% | 0.56% |
Maximum | 41.7% | 31.1% |
Range | 41.2% | 30.6% |
Mean | 11.2% | 4.7% |
Median | 6.5% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 4.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Colville by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.66%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |