Chickasaw vs Comanche Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Comanche
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Comanche
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Comanche Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,776,806 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.780 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 0.67%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Comanche | 
| Minimum | 5.7% | 12.7% | 
| Maximum | 42.5% | 66.0% | 
| Range | 36.8% | 53.3% | 
| Mean | 18.7% | 21.3% | 
| Median | 18.5% | 17.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 16.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 21.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 5.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 11.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 11.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Comanche by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Bangladeshi (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Apache (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), African (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Liberia (18.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% | 
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.7% | 
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.7% |