Jamaican vs Shoshone Family Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Shoshone
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Shoshone
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Shoshone Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,005,969 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,600,445 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Shoshone |
Minimum | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 37.5% |
Range | 34.1% | 33.9% |
Mean | 11.4% | 12.7% |
Median | 10.6% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Shoshone by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |