Cuban vs Shoshone Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Shoshone
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Shoshone
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Shoshone Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,916,186 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,600,445 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Shoshone |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 28.4% | 37.5% |
| Range | 26.2% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 12.7% |
| Median | 10.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Shoshone by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |