Eastern European vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Eastern European
Iroquois
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Iroquois
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,266,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 34.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.83% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 53.8% | 22.9% |
Range | 53.0% | 21.3% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 3.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |