Basque vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Bhutanese
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
28.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,728,632 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 20.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Basque | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 41.4% |
| Range | 93.9% | 40.1% |
| Mean | 29.2% | 15.9% |
| Median | 22.6% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.4% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Basques by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |