Nonimmigrants vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,693,652 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 33.3%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Nonimmigrants	Bhutanese
Minimum	10.5%	1.3%
Maximum	47.5%	41.4%
Range	36.9%	40.1%
Mean	21.2%	15.9%
Median	20.7%	15.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	18.9%	10.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.6%	19.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.8%	9.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.4%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.4%	7.8%

Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 23.2%
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 23.2%
Alaska Natives	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 23.3%
Marshallese	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 23.3%
Mexican American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 23.4%
Immigrants \| Azores	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 23.5%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 23.6%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 23.6%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 23.6%
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 23.7%
Immigrants \| Zaire	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 23.8%
Guatemalans	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 23.8%
German Russians	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 23.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 23.9%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 24.1%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 16.4%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 16.5%
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 16.8%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 17.0%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 17.0%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 17.3%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 17.5%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 17.7%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 17.8%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 17.9%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 17.9%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 18.0%