French American Indian vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Bhutanese
24.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,011,978 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 24.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 38.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 16.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.4% |
Range | 83.3% | 40.1% |
Mean | 41.9% | 15.9% |
Median | 36.2% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.5% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.8% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are American (24.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Osage (24.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and African (24.8%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |