Ecuadorian vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Bhutanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Bhutanese
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Bhutanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,951,403 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 22.3%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 5.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 63.8% | 41.4% |
Range | 57.9% | 40.1% |
Mean | 23.1% | 15.9% |
Median | 20.4% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Barbados (21.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (21.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |