Australian vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Puget Sound Salish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Puget Sound Salish
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,146,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 78.1% | 26.7% |
| Range | 77.2% | 23.1% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 13.0% |
| Median | 11.6% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Puget Sound Salish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |