Australian vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from North America
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from North America
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,028,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from North America |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 78.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 77.2% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 26.2% |
| Median | 11.6% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 24.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from North America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |