American vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
American
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Americans
Chinese
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 567,812,680 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 53.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.4% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 56.0% |
Range | 96.6% | 53.7% |
Mean | 33.5% | 14.3% |
Median | 26.4% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.2% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.2% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Americans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Fijian (18.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.4%, a difference of 0.47%), Nigerian (18.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and Sudanese (18.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.9% |
Bermudans | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.0% |
Marshallese | 1.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.1% |
Nepalese | 1.7 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.2% |
Americans | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.3% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.4% |
Nigerians | 1.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cree | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sudanese | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |