Alaskan Athabascan vs Crow Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
 Crow
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Crow
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Crow Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,153 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,204,118 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 0.23%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Crow | 
| Minimum | 1.7% | 4.4% | 
| Maximum | 25.6% | 20.2% | 
| Range | 23.9% | 15.8% | 
| Mean | 8.7% | 8.4% | 
| Median | 7.4% | 7.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 9.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Crow by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.26%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305  | Tragic 7.0%  |