Menominee vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Menominee
Ute
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Menominee
Ute
79.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Menominee vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,777,730 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434 and weighted average of 79.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,547 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 79.4%, a difference of 0.28%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Menominee | Ute |
| Minimum | 33.3% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 66.7% | 94.1% |
| Mean | 81.7% | 69.3% |
| Median | 83.9% | 75.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.0% | 65.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.2% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 21.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Menominee and Ute by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.44%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Sioux (80.2%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |