Chinese vs Crow In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Chinese
Crow
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Chinese
Crow
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
76.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Crow In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 77.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,196,600 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 76.9%, a difference of 0.49%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Crow |
| Minimum | 57.5% | 42.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 42.5% | 57.8% |
| Mean | 79.9% | 77.3% |
| Median | 79.7% | 78.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 75.5% | 61.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.0% | 95.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 34.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Crow by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Serbian (77.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Malaysian (77.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Croatian (77.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (77.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (77.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Icelander (76.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (76.9%, a difference of 0.020%), White/Caucasian (76.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (77.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Lithuanian (77.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Serbians | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 77.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 77.1% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 77.1% |
| Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 77.1% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 77.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 77.0% |
| Kenyans | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 77.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 77.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 77.0% |
| Lithuanians | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 77.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 76.9% |
| Crow | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 76.9% |
| Icelanders | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 76.9% |
| Slavs | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 76.9% |