Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age 20-24
75.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
72.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,475,190 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 75.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.31% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Guatemalans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Guatemalans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 within an area, or if Guatemalans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Osage (75.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guatemala (75.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from El Salvador (75.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Europe (75.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and Lebanese (75.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Mexican American Indians | 78.8 /100 | #146 | Good 75.4% |
Comanche | 77.6 /100 | #147 | Good 75.4% |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 76.7 /100 | #148 | Good 75.4% |
Ugandans | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 75.4% |
Salvadorans | 74.8 /100 | #150 | Good 75.3% |
Paiute | 74.1 /100 | #151 | Good 75.3% |
Lebanese | 73.5 /100 | #152 | Good 75.3% |
Guatemalans | 72.3 /100 | #153 | Good 75.3% |
Osage | 72.3 /100 | #154 | Good 75.3% |
Immigrants from Guatemala | 71.9 /100 | #155 | Good 75.3% |
Immigrants from El Salvador | 71.7 /100 | #156 | Good 75.3% |
Immigrants from Western Europe | 71.5 /100 | #157 | Good 75.3% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 71.0 /100 | #158 | Good 75.3% |
South American Indians | 69.0 /100 | #159 | Good 75.3% |
Japanese | 68.7 /100 | #160 | Good 75.3% |
Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Data |
Minimum | 0.18% | 39.4% |
Maximum | 61.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.1% | 60.6% |
Mean | 17.6% | 77.2% |
Median | 15.2% | 76.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 73.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 80.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 10.7% |
Correlation Details
Guatemalan Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 243,677,068 | 75.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 82,596,553 | 74.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 27,865,388 | 75.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 17,261,612 | 74.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 9,194,126 | 75.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 5,851,661 | 76.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 4,656,370 | 76.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 2,158,734 | 75.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 1,761,186 | 75.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 1,698,535 | 76.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 4,925,900 | 71.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 1,069,247 | 77.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.67% | 605,448 | 75.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 589,819 | 80.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.52% | 486,886 | 73.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 446,842 | 77.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 642,901 | 75.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 387,923 | 76.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.30% | 440,643 | 76.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82% | 292,992 | 72.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 309,145 | 77.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.72% | 268,135 | 73.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 345,791 | 70.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.54% | 251,119 | 71.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.07% | 355,047 | 78.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.50% | 139,345 | 74.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.94% | 89,720 | 80.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.51% | 125,130 | 80.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.83% | 24,506 | 91.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.23% | 136,897 | 78.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.87% | 101,332 | 80.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.27% | 46,669 | 74.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.69% | 31,874 | 55.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.15% | 5,062 | 64.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 81,504 | 83.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 79,754 | 86.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 39,022 | 76.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.94% | 13,633 | 68.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.38% | 3,555 | 72.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.66% | 11,000 | 93.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.51% | 1,275 | 54.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73% | 7,495 | 75.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.19% | 12,295 | 70.1% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.62% | 102,397 | 75.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.13% | 5,043 | 58.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.63% | 39,358 | 76.6% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.04% | 20,072 | 70.7% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 6,624 | 78.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.60% | 36,405 | 69.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.33% | 553 | 100.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.56% | 50,387 | 74.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.76% | 7,834 | 81.2% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.11% | 57,033 | 80.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.67% | 1,796 | 39.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.37% | 5,468 | 80.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.98% | 2,205 | 87.5% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.43% | 10,418 | 84.3% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.49% | 879 | 60.9% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.60% | 2,506 | 71.8% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.32% | 3,763 | 95.2% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.63% | 10,371 | 73.9% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.61% | 631 | 100.0% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.14% | 21,778 | 76.3% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.43% | 175 | 100.0% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.70% | 149 | 100.0% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.44% | 77 | 100.0% |
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.24% | 129 | 92.9% |