Chinese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,320,097 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 39.0%, a difference of 1.1%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Minimum	12.8%	5.6%
Maximum	75.9%	67.6%
Range	63.1%	62.0%
Mean	40.5%	41.3%
Median	39.4%	40.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	35.7%	36.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	42.8%	49.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.1%	12.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.5%	11.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.4%	11.0%

Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Alaska Native (39.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Puget Sound Salish (39.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American (39.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Osage (39.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Blackfeet (38.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Puget Sound Salish	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 39.1%
Alaska Natives	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 39.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 39.0%
Spanish Americans	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 39.0%
Osage	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 39.0%
Blackfeet	99.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North America	99.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 38.9%
Latvians	99.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 38.9%
Greeks	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 38.9%
Ugandans	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 38.7%
Iraqis	98.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 38.6%
Delaware	98.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 38.6%
Chinese	98.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 38.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 38.6%