Chinese vs Maltese In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Chinese
Maltese
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Chinese
Maltese
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Maltese In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,398,157 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 38.5%, a difference of 0.22%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Maltese |
| Minimum | 12.8% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 75.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.1% | 93.3% |
| Mean | 40.5% | 43.7% |
| Median | 39.4% | 43.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.7% | 35.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.8% | 50.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 14.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Maltese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Crow (38.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Scotland (38.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Subsaharan African (38.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Ugandans | 99.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 38.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 38.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 99.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Hmong | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |