Chinese vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Chinese
Choctaw
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Chinese
Choctaw
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,371,385 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 38.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 12.8% | 6.9% |
| Maximum | 75.9% | 61.9% |
| Range | 63.1% | 55.0% |
| Mean | 40.5% | 33.8% |
| Median | 39.4% | 35.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.7% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.8% | 39.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Choctaw by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Maltese (38.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Crow (38.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Scotland (38.5%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are African (38.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Africa (38.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from England (38.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Seminole (38.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (38.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 97.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 38.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 38.2% |
| Seminole | 96.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 38.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 38.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 96.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 38.0% |
| Africans | 95.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 38.0% |
| Choctaw | 95.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 38.0% |