Yup'ik vs Guamanian/Chamorro In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Guamanian/Chamorro
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Guamanians/Chamorros
62.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Guamanian/Chamorro In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,964,003 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,958,282 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 4.6%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 32.3% | 47.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 89.8% |
| Range | 67.7% | 42.2% |
| Mean | 63.0% | 63.8% |
| Median | 63.6% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.5% | 59.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 68.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Potawatomi (62.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |