Yup'ik vs Ute In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Ute
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Ute
62.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
60.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Ute In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,964,003 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.640 and weighted average of 60.9%, a difference of 3.0%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Ute |
Minimum | 32.3% | 19.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 66.7% |
Range | 67.7% | 47.3% |
Mean | 63.0% | 51.3% |
Median | 63.6% | 53.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.5% | 41.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 61.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 19.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Ute by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Potawatomi (62.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Crow (60.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Paiute (60.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Creek (61.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Choctaw (61.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and Dutch West Indian (61.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |