Immigrants from Argentina vs Guamanian/Chamorro In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,438,134 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,958,282 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.0%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Argentina	Guamanian/Chamorro
Minimum	45.7%	47.6%
Maximum	76.4%	89.8%
Range	30.7%	42.2%
Mean	64.2%	63.8%
Median	65.4%	65.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	59.9%	59.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.5%	68.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.6%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.3%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.2%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Guamanians/Chamorros by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%