Immigrants from China vs Subsaharan African Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Subsaharan African
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Immigrants from China
Sub-Saharan Africans
26.7%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.8%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Subsaharan African Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,702,733 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261 and weighted average of 26.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,315,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 22.8%, a difference of 16.9%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 6.5% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 55.3% | 45.6% |
Range | 48.9% | 44.8% |
Mean | 27.2% | 20.1% |
Median | 27.6% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.4% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.9% | 23.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Wage/Income Gap
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Iraq (26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (26.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Portugal (26.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (26.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Mongolian (26.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 26.5% |
Egyptians | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 26.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 12.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 26.6% |
Arabs | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 26.6% |
Mongolians | 11.4 /100 | #211 | Poor 26.6% |
Iraqis | 11.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 26.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants | China | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 26.7% |
Yugoslavians | 9.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 9.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 26.7% |
Brazilians | 9.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 9.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 8.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 8.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants | Spain | 8.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 26.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (22.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (22.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Fijian (22.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Guatemalans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 22.6% |
Central American Indians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 22.7% |
Menominee | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 22.7% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 22.7% |
Indonesians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 22.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 22.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 22.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 22.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 22.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 22.8% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 22.9% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 22.9% |
Africans | 99.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 22.9% |
Nigerians | 99.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 23.0% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 23.0% |