Immigrants from China vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 38.5%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Subsaharan African
Minimum	1.0%	0.78%
Maximum	22.2%	62.5%
Range	21.2%	61.7%
Mean	7.5%	15.6%
Median	6.9%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.5%	9.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.4%	18.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.9%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.5%	11.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.4%	11.0%

Similar Demographics by Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Family Poverty

In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Poverty
Northern Europeans	98.3 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 7.8%
Australians	98.2 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Canada	98.2 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 7.8%
Cambodians	98.2 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.2 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 7.8%
Austrians	98.2 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Croatia	98.1 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	98.0 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 7.9%
Ukrainians	98.0 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| North America	97.9 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Europe	97.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 7.9%
English	97.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 7.9%
Irish	97.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 7.9%

Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty

In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Poverty
Iroquois	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 10.7%
Immigrants \| Zaire	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 10.7%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 10.7%
Ecuadorians	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 10.8%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 10.8%
Chickasaw	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 10.8%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 10.8%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 10.9%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 10.9%
Bangladeshis	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 10.9%
Shoshone	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 10.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #262	Tragic 10.9%
Cape Verdeans	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 10.9%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 10.9%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 10.9%