Immigrants from China vs Subsaharan African Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Subsaharan African
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Sub-Saharan Africans
9.5%
MALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
MALE DISABILITY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Subsaharan African Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,000,034 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,010,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 23.6%.

Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.2% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 36.8% | 38.5% |
Range | 33.5% | 34.8% |
Mean | 10.0% | 13.8% |
Median | 8.6% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Singapore (9.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Israel (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.4%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Alsatian (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Panamanians | 3.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 3.8 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.7% |
Alsatians | 3.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 3.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.7% |
Japanese | 3.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.7% |
Liberians | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.8% |
Austrians | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.8% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.8% |
Bermudans | 2.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.8% |
Croatians | 2.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.8% |
Dominicans | 1.8 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.8% |
Malaysians | 1.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.8% |
Mexicans | 1.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.8% |