Turkish vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Turkish
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Turks
Sub-Saharan Africans
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,710,288 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 35.7% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 81.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.8% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 65.5% | 62.5% |
| Median | 64.5% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 68.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Turks by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |