Basque vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Basque
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Basques
Sub-Saharan Africans
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,752,297 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 4.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Basque | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 38.8% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 61.2% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 68.5% | 62.5% |
| Median | 66.7% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.1% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.3% | 68.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.3% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Basques by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from China (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |