Immigrants from Jamaica vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Sub-Saharan Africans
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,592,909 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 4.2%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 46.2% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 85.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 67.4% |
Mean | 66.6% | 62.5% |
Median | 66.4% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.6% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.5% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |