Immigrants from Croatia vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Sub-Saharan Africans
63.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,568,699 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 63.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 1.6%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 36.9% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 96.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.4% | 67.4% |
Mean | 66.3% | 62.5% |
Median | 65.4% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.7% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Immigrants from Turkey (63.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Austria (63.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (63.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Lumbee (63.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and West Indian (63.1%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Kenyans | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 63.2% |
Colville | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 63.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.5 /100 | #266 | Tragic 63.1% |
Israelis | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 0.4 /100 | #268 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #269 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |