Immigrants from Latvia vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Sub-Saharan Africans
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,726,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 0.12%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 31.9% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 86.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 54.2% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 61.9% | 62.5% |
| Median | 65.2% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.5% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 68.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |