Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Luxembourgers
Sub-Saharan Africans
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,654,456 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 63.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 41.4% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 93.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.9% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 67.9% | 62.5% |
| Median | 67.5% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.2% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 68.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cypriots | 0.6 /100 | #260 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.5 /100 | #263 | Tragic 63.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |