Turkish vs Osage Family Households
COMPARE
Turkish
Osage
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Turks
Osage
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Osage Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,710,288 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%, a difference of 0.16%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Osage |
| Minimum | 35.7% | 49.2% |
| Maximum | 81.5% | 77.6% |
| Range | 45.8% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 65.5% | 64.8% |
| Median | 64.5% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 61.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 68.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Osage by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |