Immigrants from Sudan vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Chinese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Chinese
33.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,444,182 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 33.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 9.8%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Chinese |
Minimum | 6.3% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 74.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.9% | 94.5% |
Mean | 36.3% | 41.4% |
Median | 33.8% | 33.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.0% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.4% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 25.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Uruguayan (33.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are European (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |