Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Chinese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Chinese
29.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,150,385 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720 and weighted average of 29.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Chinese |
| Minimum | 20.3% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 79.7% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 39.6% | 41.4% |
| Median | 30.7% | 33.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.5% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.7% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Chinese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Netherlands (29.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Argentinean (30.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Italy (29.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Ethiopian (29.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Ugandan (30.1%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are European (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Basques | 93.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Scandinavians | 92.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 92.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Ethiopians | 91.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 91.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 91.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Argentineans | 90.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
| New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |