Syrian vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Syrian
Chinese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Syrians
Chinese
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,644,243 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 30.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 0.25%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 7.3% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.7% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 44.5% | 41.4% |
| Median | 34.9% | 33.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.1% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.3% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.2% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.8% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Chinese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Argentina (30.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Korean (30.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and European (30.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are European (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Spain (30.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Ethiopians | 91.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 91.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 91.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Argentineans | 90.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
| New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |