Iroquois vs Hawaiian Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Iroquois
Hawaiian
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Iroquois
Hawaiians
25.4%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Hawaiian Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,066,685 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,781,274 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 25.5%, a difference of 0.34%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 12.8% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 51.5% |
| Range | 87.2% | 48.8% |
| Mean | 34.8% | 26.3% |
| Median | 31.1% | 25.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.6% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.6% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Hawaiians by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Samoan (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Cape Verdean (25.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Guatemalan (25.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Latin America (25.6%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Guatemalan (25.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latin America (25.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Ottawa (25.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Samoan (25.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Liberian (25.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #253 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.6 /100 | #254 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.5 /100 | #255 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.4 /100 | #256 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Samoans | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Hawaiians | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Guatemalans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Hmong | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Japanese | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 25.7% |