Yakama vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Yakama
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Yakama
Australians
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 18.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Australian |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 15.8% |
| Range | 12.0% | 13.3% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 6.9% |
| Median | 7.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |