Yakama vs French Canadian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Yakama
French Canadian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Yakama
French Canadians
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs French Canadian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,380,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 1.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | French Canadian |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 32.4% |
| Range | 12.0% | 30.5% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 9.0% |
| Median | 7.3% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and French Canadians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |