Choctaw vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Choctaw
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Choctaw
Australians
8.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,636,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 44.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Australian |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 15.8% |
| Range | 25.8% | 13.3% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 6.9% |
| Median | 12.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |