Scottish vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Scottish
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Scottish
Australians
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,616,487 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Australian |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 15.8% |
| Range | 59.4% | 13.3% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 6.9% |
| Median | 9.4% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Welsh (6.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |