Dominican vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Dominican
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Dominicans
Australians
7.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,945,896 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 24.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dominican | Australian |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 15.8% |
| Range | 18.3% | 13.3% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 6.9% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Central American Indian (7.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.50%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |