Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Australian Ambulatory Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 2.7%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	Australian
Minimum	2.5%	2.5%
Maximum	22.3%	15.8%
Range	19.7%	13.3%
Mean	6.4%	6.9%
Median	5.7%	6.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.3%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.2%	7.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	0.93%	2.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.0%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.0%	3.0%

Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Ambulatory Disability

In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Ambulatory Disability
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	93.6 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.9%
Russians	93.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 5.9%
Norwegians	93.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 5.9%
Estonians	92.9 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 5.9%
Costa Ricans	92.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 5.9%
Icelanders	92.6 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Russia	92.4 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 5.9%
Koreans	91.6 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 5.9%
Arabs	91.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	90.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	90.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Norway	90.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	89.7 /100 \| #130	Excellent 5.9%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	89.5 /100 \| #131	Excellent 5.9%

Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability

In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Ambulatory Disability
Eastern Europeans	99.2 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 5.7%
Ugandans	99.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 5.7%
South Americans	99.0 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 5.7%
Latvians	99.0 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 5.7%
Immigrants \| Chile	98.9 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 5.8%
Soviet Union	98.9 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 5.8%
Bhutanese	98.8 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 5.8%
Australians	98.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Sudan	98.8 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	98.6 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Denmark	98.6 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 5.8%
Kenyans	98.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	98.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 5.8%
Salvadorans	98.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Somalia	98.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 5.8%