Immigrants from Taiwan vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Australians
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,204,789 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 16.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Australian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 10.0% | 15.8% |
Range | 8.4% | 13.3% |
Mean | 4.6% | 6.9% |
Median | 4.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Filipino (4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |