African vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
African
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Africans
Australians
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,824,822 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 21.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | African | Australian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 15.8% |
Range | 25.7% | 13.3% |
Mean | 9.7% | 6.9% |
Median | 8.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |