Immigrants from Latvia vs Serbian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Serbian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Serbians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Serbian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,721,440 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,561,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 4.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Serbian |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 6.0% | 15.5% |
| Range | 5.7% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Colombia (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Belgians | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 75.5 /100 | #151 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
| Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 2.1% |
| Pakistanis | 71.6 /100 | #156 | Good 2.1% |
| Serbians | 70.2 /100 | #157 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 2.1% |
| South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
| Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
| Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
| Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |